VC9, Boost 1.37.1

[sunside]

On my system, compiling with VC9, the FindBoost?.cmake macro fails.

Adding the following part around line 140 fixes this

    if (MSVC90)
      if (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE STREQUAL Debug)
        set(BOOST_LIBRARIES_SUFFIXES
          -vc90-mt-gd-1_37_1
          -vc90-mt-gd-1_34_1
          -vc90-mt-gd-1_34
          -vc90-mt-gd-1_33_1
        )
      else (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE STREQUAL Debug)
        set(BOOST_LIBRARIES_SUFFIXES
          -vc90-mt-1_37_1
          -vc90-mt-1_34_1
          -vc90-mt-1_34
          -vc90-mt-1_33_1
        )
      endif (CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE STREQUAL Debug)
    endif (MSVC90)

[sunside]

(Maybe the http://trac.qutecom.org/wiki/HowToBuildFromSource page should also mention to set the BOOSTINCLUDEDIR and BOOSTLIBDIR environment variables, because most probably the "program files" guesses will fail)

[sunside]

Sorry, this should have been "-1_37" instead of "-1_37_1".

[laurent]

did you succeed to build qutecom with boost 1.37.x ?

[sunside]

Actually ... no. The problem doesn't seem to be Boost, though. The compilation fails with some ws2def.h inclusion problems, my guess is that some of the winsock.h don't play too well with the winsock2.h, but I haven't found out which header is causing the problems.

[ 38%] Built target phapiutil
[ 39%] Built target stun
[ 39%] Building C object libs/3rdparty/pthread/CMakeFiles/pthread.dir/src/attr.obj
attr.c
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.1\include\ws2def.h(91) : warning C4005: 'AF_IPX' : macro redefinition
        C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.1\include\winsock.h(460) : see previous definition of 'AF_IPX'
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.1\include\ws2def.h(116) : warning C4005: 'AF_MAX' : macro redefinition
        C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.1\include\winsock.h(479) : see previous definition of 'AF_MAX'
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.1\include\ws2def.h(163) : warning C4005: 'SO_DONTLINGER' : macro redefinition
        C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.1\include\winsock.h(402) : see previous definition of 'SO_DONTLINGER'
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.1\include\ws2def.h(207) : error C2011: 'sockaddr' : 'struct' type redefinition
        C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.1\include\winsock.h(485) : see declaration of 'sockaddr'
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.1\include\ws2def.h(385) : error C2059: syntax error : 'constant'
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.1\include\ws2def.h(519) : warning C4005: 'IN_CLASSA' : macro redefinition
        C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v6.1\include\winsock.h(287) : see previous definition of 'IN_CLASSA'

... repeated ...

[laurent]

winsock.h don't play too well with the winsock2.h

Yes, You're right

[Nathan2010]

did you succeed to build qutecom with boost 1.37.x ?

qutecom air jordan